From
www.theskilledinvestor.com, the home of VeriPlan, the do it yourself financial planning calculator for lifetime budgeting, savings, investing, taxes, and retirement
Investment astrology – should you pick investments according to the Morningstars?
Category : Mutual Fund Rating Services - Morningstar Star Ratings
Investment astrology – should you pick investments according to the Morningstars?
Summary: Morningstar, Inc. first introduced its five
star Morningstar Rating* system for funds in 1985. Individual investors
and their advisors appear to make investment decisions that are heavily
influenced by the Morningstar Rating system. Because the stars are very
widely used and often misunderstood, The Skilled Investor has published a variety of articles to help investors make more rational decisions about the stars.
Ratings service articles related to Morningstar are listed below with brief summaries:
- Summary: Investors appear to use the five-star Morningstar
Rating system as a shorthand metric to identify supposedly superior
funds. Unfortunately, the stars do not seem to identify funds with
persistently superior future performance. However, the stars may help
to identify inferior funds that are more likely to continue to perform
poorly in the future.
- Summary: As of June 30, 2002, Morningstar, Inc. began to use
significantly revised methods to define its star ratings for mutual
funds. This article summarizes Morningstar’s new Morningstar
Rating methods as defined in its publications.
- Summary: From 1985 to 2002, increasingly large numbers of
individual investors directed billions of their investments dollars
into funds that scored higher according to the old Morningstar Rating
system. Morningstar has said that its old star ratings system had
serious flaws.
- Summary: Compared to its old system, early data indicates
that Morningstar’s new star ratings system may have some
performance predictability. However, the new stars may just be a proxy
for fund costs. Instead of using the stars, investors should use costs
to screen funds, which are a more direct and proven indicator of future
fund performance.
- Summary: Morningstar has stated variously that its stars can
help investors: a) to diversify, b) to identify fund managers who add
value, c) to distinguish between similar funds, d) to easily interpret
past fund performance, e) to make it easier to build a portfolio, and
f) to provide a more intuitive measure of historical risk adjusted
returns.
- Summary: Morningstar has stated that its stars cannot provide
a single fund screening and selection measurement nor predict future
mutual fund performance. Morningstar’s position on performance
prediction contrasts with the actions of many mutual fund investors who
apparently believe that the star rating system has predictive powers.
- Summary: Individual investors are challenged to select among
thousands of mutual funds. Investment decision simplification is a
laudable goal, but only if it is done in a way that is more likely to
enhance expected risk-adjusted investment returns.
- Summary: A loaded fund with a high star rating can cloud an
investor’s judgment. A loaded fund with a 4 or 5 star rating is
not likely to retain its high rating in the future. While loaded funds
with high star ratings are good for sales advisor/agents on commission,
they may not be the best funds for you.
- Summary: Mutual fund companies seem to exploit “four-
and five-star only” investor beliefs. Advertising practices by
mutual fund families are selective concerning which mutual fund star
ratings they will advertise. You would be challenged to find any mutual
fund family that advertises its one- or two-star rated funds, and the
advertisement of a three-star fund is infrequent.
- Summary: Morningstar Ratings have been quite unstable over
time. If an investor buys a 4 or 5 star rated fund and expects it to
stay that way, he is likely to be surprised.
- Summary: If an investor expects the Morningstar star ratings
to be stable, long-term indicators for long-term investing, then he
probably will be quite disappointed by their lack of ratings
persistence. Instead of the stars, The Skilled Investor recommends that
investors give much higher priority to alternate metrics to screen
mutual funds.
- Summary: An analysis of the flow of investments into and out
of mutual funds demonstrated a direct relationship between Morningstar
Rating changes and investor reactions. Morningstar ratings upgrades
resulted in positive abnormal mutual fund investment inflows, and
downgrades caused lower than normal inflows or increased outflows. The
dollar effects of ratings involving 4 and 5 stars we the strongest.
- Summary: A study found that active trading when Morningstar
Ratings changed lead to positive pre-expense returns at all levels of
star ratings changes. However, the “excess” returns to
these strategies did not hold up once associated expenses were
considered. Expenses for monitoring, trading, and paying taxes and
loads easily outweighed any positive returns to these strategies.
- Summary: Morningstar Ratings have demonstrated some modest
predictive information about performance. However, most individual
investors will probably be very surprised about what kind of predictive
information the stars provide. The stars have been a mild predictor of
inferior performance. However, investors act as if the stars predict
superior future performance, yet they may contain no such information.
- Summary: The star ratings are oversimplified. Many investors
and their advisors use the stars as their primary decision criterion
and as shorthand for fund selection. Alternate, more sophisticated
approaches are available, which are more likely to lead to optimal
returns.
* The Morningstar Rating is a trademark of Morningstar, Inc. The
Morningstar Rating has also been referred to in the media as the
Morningstar stars, the star rating, the star rating system, etc.
Morningstar’s five-star rating system is the most visible aspect
of this firm’s broader set of products and services. From its
website, Morningstar described itself as “a global investment
research firm whose mission is to help investors make better decisions
to reach their financial goals. Based in Chicago, the company offers an
extensive line of print, software, and Web-based products and services
for individual investors, professional financial advisors, and
institutions. ... Founded in 1984, the company is now the trusted
source for investment information, data, and analysis of stocks, mutual
funds, exchange-traded funds, closed-end funds, separate accounts, and
variable annuity/life subaccounts. ... Morningstar has a global
presence in the investment community, with operations in the United
States, Asia, Australia, Canada, Europe, and New Zealand. The company
currently tracks, analyzes, and publishes information on nearly 100,000
investment securities.”1
© Copyright 2005, 2006, or 2007 - Lawrence Russell and Company, All rights reserved worldwide.
The particular year of the copyright will depend upon the year of first publication.
"The Skilled Investor", "Skilled Investor", "VeriPlan", "Personal Finance Software for Your Lifetime", "Do it Yourself Financial Planning", and "Your Personal Financial Lifecycle Planner" are trademarks of Lawrence Russell and Company. All other trademarks and service marks are the properties of their respective owners.
DISCLAIMER: This information is solely for your personal household finance purposes and is subject to the Terms of Use. It does not constitute financial, investment, or retirement planning advice. It is not a solicitation or offer to sell advisory services in any jurisdiction. You should seek professional advice, if you need help with budgeting, savings, investing, asset allocation, or asset management, including help in analyzing calculator returns, discounted cash flow, compound interest growth, return on investment, net present value, future values, net worth, or any other output of our calculators.