Complete portfolio diversification is always a better idea.
On average, the securities markets will not pay you to hold any skewed subset of the overall market. Doing so is just a gamble that may or may not pay off. You should not expect to be paid any more for the added risk and anxiety.
A previous article, “The Solution - ONLY follow financial strategies that are scientific, passive, diversified, savings focused, risk controlled, low cost, and tax efficient,” suggested that individuals are much better off with a well-considered financial viewpoint. A stable set of financial beliefs can help you to keep focused and on track throughout your life. This follow-up article discusses the need to diversify your portfolio fully to eliminate uncompensated investment risks.
Portfolio diversification is the only genuinely ‘free’ financial lunch that is available to individuals. A diversified portfolio is expected to deliver the same expected return with lower expected risk compared to an undiversified or partially diversified portfolio. To diversify completely, hold the full market in your portfolio, instead of a subset of it. Always really does mean always. (See: Why is diversification valuable to individual investors? and Is the average individual investor portfolio well diversified?)
The value of diversification comes from risk reduction. Diversification reduces overall portfolio risk, but it does not increase expected returns. It produces no free money. It just helps reduce the variability of the expected outcome. Greater certainty, even if still uncertain, is highly beneficial to any risk-averse investor. (See: Can a limited number of stocks provide complete portfolio diversification?)
Index investment funds can provide full diversification at a very low-cost. Holding individual securities will not. Securities markets tend only to compensate overall market risk and a couple of other well established, but relatively minor additional risk factors. Additional enterprise level risks that are inherent in owing individual stocks and bonds are not compensated. Bearing such risks is unnecessary and unproductive. Furthermore, tracking details about individual companies is just a huge waste of your valuable personal time, as you try to pick one company’s securities over another’s. (See: Investment securities markets do not pay you for the risks of holding individual common stocks and bonds and How many mutual funds are needed for a well-diversified portfolio? – evidence)
If you hold any concentrated position in the securities of any individual firm, you should quickly take steps to diversify. If you hold a concentrated position in the same firm that issues your paycheck, you certainly should liquidate and diversify without any further delay. If taxes or other considerations inhibit making immediate changes, consult with an advisor about alternative strategies to use, until you can liquidate your concentrated position in an orderly manner.
Tags:
diversified portfolio,
diversify your portfolio,
financial strategies,
individual securities,
investment funds,
investment risk,
investment risks,
investment securities,
market risk,
mutual fund,
mutual funds,
portfolio diversification,
portfolio risk,
risk averse,
securities market,
theskilledinvestor.com
Related Personal Financial Planning Posts
- July 26 2007 Edition of the Carnival of Financial Planning (
Carnival of Financial Planning - July 26, 2007 Edition
Welcome to the July 26, 2007 edition of the Carnival of Financial Planning.
The Carnival of Financial Planning takes a long-term view of personal financial planning for individuals and families. We focus on efficient and sustainable personal financial planning practices that can lead to lifetime financial security. This [...])
- How to distinguish between true investment skill and luck (
Even if an investor has obtained superior results over an extended period, is this sufficient proof that these investment results were actually due to skill rather than just a lucky streak?
No, these investment results could still be due to chance. For example, take a large population, such as all individual investors in the U.S., and [...])
- Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX) gains a +5 Fund Authority Score (
The diversified investment fund strategy of the Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX)
According to its prospectus filing on the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission EDGAR system, the investment strategy of the Fidelity Contrafund is to invest primarily in common stocks and particularly in the "securities of companies whose value Fidelity Management & Research Company believes is not fully [...])
- No Financial Planning Software or Calculator Can Predict the Future (
No financial planning software and no investment growth calculator can predict the future
The future is simply not predictable, even with automated financial planning software.
A previous financial article, “The Solution - ONLY follow financial strategies that are scientific, passive, diversified, savings focused, risk controlled, low cost, and tax efficient,” suggested that investors are much better off [...])
- Vanguard 500 Index Fund - VFINX - merits the Best +10 Fund Authority Score (The Standard & Poors 500 stock index is the most common equity index fund benchmark in the U.S. The S and P 500 tracks about 75% of publicly traded U.S. equity market asset value. The dominant issue in choosing among passively managed index mutual funds and ETF funds benchmarked against the S & P 500 [...])
- Risk-Free Investment Money Is Fantasy Money (
For Individual Investors Risk-Free Investment Money Is Fantasy Money
Securities with low investment risk and high investment returns are just fantasies.
No "risk-free" investment money is consistently and reliably available to individuals. Luck dominates skill in the securities markets. Clever investment selection is vastly over-hyped, and only the promoters tend to benefit. On average over long periods, [...])
- Lifetime Investment Assets of Renters with Reduced Investment Costs (
Lifetime investment assets of renters through investment cost improvements
Improving on Fran and Fred's lifetime financial plan through lower investment costs
Fran and Fred Frugal, both age 30, are a married working couple with $100,000 in combined annual earned income. They want to understand how valuable different personal finance strategies could be to their lifetime finances and [...])
- Financial Industry Product Development and Your Best Interests (
Financial research drives industry product development, but not necessarily toward the best interests of individuals
Personal financial decisions seem to have become very complicated. To add to the confusion, the financial services industry develops an unending array of supposedly innovative new products. However, a large part of the complexity that individuals face results from the proliferation [...])
No comment yet