Choose mutual funds and ETFs with MUCH LOWER investment management expenses
Investment fund management fees can only be justified by individual investors, if higher net returns more than compensate for these fees. Sadly, this is most often not the case with actively managed equity and bond mutual funds and exchange-traded funds (ETFs). In addition, you have no reliable way to tell beforehand which actively managed fund will return more than its costs, when compared to an index fund.
Because higher fund fees cause the average actively managed fund to trail the return of index funds, your chances of picking a supposedly superior actively managed fund are greatly reduced.
Only a minority of actively managed mutual funds and ETFs perform well enough to compensate for their higher fees in the short run. In the longer term, even fewer actively managed equity and bond funds will beat the market, because “superior” short-term performance is mostly due to luck rather than to skill, and luck tends not to last.
Certain scientific studies have demonstrated that some professionally managed equity mutual funds seem to exhibit a very modest level of apparent skill in their ability either to choose stocks and/or to manage their stock portfolios. These funds may be slightly better stock pickers, and/or they may have better portfolio management practices. In managing their portfolios, these funds may not make the behavioral mistakes that many individual investors do, such as holding losers too long and selling winners too quickly.
Scientific finance studies have demonstrated a very slight persistence in stock price trends for some, but not all equities. This persistence could benefit portfolio managers who hold their winners longer and sell their losers more quickly. Evidence of skill for bonds seems entirely lacking, so buying lower cost bond funds is clearly a better strategy.
Note: Just because scientific finance studies do not support buying actively managed stock and bond funds on a net investor returns basis, this does not mean that professional money managers are not skillful. To the contrary, the level of professional expertise in portfolio management at most fund companies is very high. However, unlike American schools and colleges, the real-time securities markets have built-in grade and achievement deflators.
On average, the markets deliver C level returns before costs. If your costs are lower, you are more likely to get an A or B. If your costs are higher, you are more likely to get a D or F. The major factor that adds to all the confusion is that market participants must put a current, risk-adjusted value on future economic prospects. Therefore, securities market prices are highly volatile. Market participants will eventually be graded on the impact of currently unknowable future events. Some will be lucky, while others will not be.
Scientific studies, which show some minor level of skill among active professional fund managers, help to perpetuate the active-versus-passive “debate.” However, from the perspective of the individual investor, this tired argument is simply irrelevant. Scientific finance studies have the advantage of being done after the fact, and they use large sets of historical data to see what actually did happen.Without a crystal ball, individual investors face the daunting task of trying to pick a few future winners out of a large crowd of losers that will not provide a positive net return after all additional fee, transaction, tax, and time costs are taken into account.
The scientific financial studies that demonstrate some minor professional skill do not show that the increased performance justifies paying the far higher fees charged by actively managed funds.
On average, actively managed funds simply do not have sufficiently higher returns to cover even the higher management fees that they charge directly. Furthermore, higher active transactions costs are sometimes left out of the evaluation, even though they can also drag down net returns for higher turnover funds. These studies usually do not account for increased taxes paid by individual investors caused by active trading. Finally, they do not measure the opportunity cost related to an individual investor’s extra time spent on futile, ongoing efforts to pick “superior” funds that most often will not be.
An investor is better served by choosing from among the numerous mutual funds and exchange-traded funds that have decided to compete on cost and efficiency and that are trying to attract individual investors’ money by charging very low fees.
Obviously, a decision rule that focuses on lower fees will strongly favor passively managed index funds over actively managed funds.
When screening mutual funds and ETFs, you should first set a relatively stringent upper limit on the annual expense ratio that you are willing to pay. With passively managed domestic index funds, .5% annually is a very overly generous upper limit. Many domestic index funds are available with management fees under .25% and some are as low as .1%. Because of their variety, it is not as easy to generalize about screening of international and foreign index funds. However, lower management costs should still be a key screening rule for these funds.
With actively managed mutual funds, you first have to ask yourself whether you have a valid reason for preferring them to passively managed index funds and ETFs.
If you have a good reason to select an actively managed fund, which most individual investors will not have, then you should still seek lower management fees among active funds. You might start screening with an upper expense ratio limit of .75% or even lower.
Also, if you want to understand the personal impact of investment expenses, take a look at VeriPlan. VeriPlan’s ability to project your full lifecycle investment costs can be incredibly useful to you. Your personal VeriPlan projections automatically analyze the impact of five types of investment expenses across your lifecycle: 1) purchase fees, 2) fund management fees, 3) marketing fees, 4) transactions costs, and 5) account custody fees. To analyze the lifetime impact of excessive investment costs, VeriPlan also allows you automatically to switch back and forth between projections that use your portfolio’s current investment costs and projections that use costs that you think are reasonable to pay. For more information, see: VeriPlan helps you to understand the full lifecycle cost to you of excessive investment expenses
Tags: management expenses
Personal Financial Planning
- Part 2 of the Biggest Personal Finance Story of the Past 30 Years (< -- Go to Part 1
The Biggest Personal Finance Story of the Past 30 Years - Part 2
To understand what has happened to the market valuation of the financial services sector, particularly over the last 30 years, you should view Figure 4 on page 16 of the financial study by Jeremy Siegel and Jeremy Schwartz [...])
- How to Lie with Statistics – Investment Performance Charts (How to lie with statistics: Investment performance charts - A Tip from The Skilled Investor
Darrell Huff wrote a short and very informative book, "How to Lie with Statistics," which was first published in 1954 and was amusingly illustrated by Irving Geis. This book is still in print and remains very popular (Amazon book rank #2,040 [...])
- Fund Authority Scores for Stock ETFs and Mutual Funds – Management expenses, sales loads, and trading cost factors (
Fund Authority Scores range from -10 to +10 and measure five factors for diversified stock or equity investment funds: 1) annualized management and sales expenses, 2) trading costs, 3) historical performance, 4) fund maturity, and 5) operating efficiency.
Go to Part 2 -->>
This article explains how Fund Authority Scores rate stock or equity mutual funds and [...])
- Determine the Savings You Need for Your Lifetime Financial Goals (You cannot invest without savings. How much savings are enough? ... too little? ... too much?
Currently, the U.S. is experiencing a savings crisis. The net personal savings rate is zero or slightly negative, despite a healthy and growing economy. This situation is a prescription for millions upon millions of future personal financial disasters. (See: [...])
- Commodity Futures in Your Investment Portfolio (Commodity futures in your investment portfolio - Is there really any future for individual investors?
The Skilled Investor's previous article, "Be wary of the new investment asset classes," voiced skepticism about many supposedly new asset classes. This article delves into the financial science behind this skepticism, as it relates to one of these supposedly new asset [...])
- No Financial Planning Software or Calculator Can Predict the Future (No financial planning software and no investment growth calculator can predict the future
The future is simply not predictable, even with automated financial planning software.
A previous financial article, “The Solution - ONLY follow financial strategies that are scientific, passive, diversified, savings focused, risk controlled, low cost, and tax efficient,” suggested that investors are much better off [...])
- The Biggest Personal Finance Story of the Past 30 Years – Part 3 (< <-- Go to Part 2
The Biggest Personal Finance Story of the Past 30 Years - Part 3
There is no reason to believe that industry self-regulation or governmental regulation will ever fix these problems. Only those individuals who become wise enough to be proactive and seek out lower cost financial products will stop getting fleeced. [...])
- Developing Fund Authority Scores for ETFs and Mutual Funds (
Select mutual funds and ETFs with the most important economic factors that affect long term, diversified, and risk-adjusted investment fund returns
Good things are born small and grow over time. Regularly, The Skilled Investor evaluates individual mutual funds and ETFs and adds new articles that use the Fund Authority Score rating system. To be alerted when [...])
- Insure against risks economically – Step 8 of 10 Financial Planning Steps in the Right Direction (CLICK HERE TO READ THE SKILLED INVESTOR's OTHER ARTICLES ABOUT THESE "10 FINANCIAL PLANNING STEPS IN THE RIGHT DIRECTION
While value, affordability, risk exposure, and risk tolerance should affect insurance purchase decisions, insurance is often sold and purchased emotionally. Yet, insurance premium payments reduce personal funds that might otherwise be available for additional investments. Many people [...])
- Understand Your Lifetime Personal Savings Requirements (VeriPlan helps you to understand your lifetime personal savings requirements and whether your current savings rate is sufficient
How much you earn, spend, and save are by far the most dominant determinants of your long-term financial well-being.
You need a means to evaluate your current sustainable lifecycle consumption rate. VeriPlan provides such a means. VeriPlan projects your [...])
- The Quality and Cost of Advice Paid by Investment Sales Loads (Can you really get free and objective investment advice, when you pay investment sales loads?
Excessive investment expenses are one of the most significant barriers to your family's lifelong financial security.
Excessive investment costs are a plague on your personal financial planning. While financial services industry sales people tell you that you need to pay more to [...])
- American Funds – AMCAP Fund – Class A Shares (AMCPX) fetch a +1 Fund Authority Score (The table below in this article presents The Skilled Investor's Fund Authority Score and other information for the American Funds - AMCAP Fund - Class A Shares.
The diversified investment fund strategy of the American Funds - AMCAP Fund - Class A mutual fund shares (AMCPX)
According to its prospectus filing on the U.S. Securities and Exchange [...])
- The Heavy Burden of Recurring Investment Expenses and Fees – Part 2 (
The heavy burden of recurring investment fees (Part 2 of 2)
< < -- Go to Part 1
By charging fees as a percent of your assets, the investment industry can make their recurring fees seem small – like they are “just a few” percent.
Furthermore, by charging fees against your assets the industry can still bill you [...])
- American Funds – Washington Mutual Investors Fund – Class A Shares (AWSHX) acquire a +2 Fund Authority Score (Fund Authority Scores rate mutual funds and exchange traded funds (ETFs) on the most important economic factors that influence individual investors' net long term diversified investment fund performance. The Skilled Investor developed the Fund Authority Score system to provide individual investors with concise and objective summaries of mutual funds and ETFs for comparisons within investment [...])
- Retirement Savings Needs of Renters Without Financial Planning Improvements (Retirement savings needs of renters prior to any financial planning improvements
Starting to plan with a non-optimal baseline projection
Fran and Fred Frugal, both age 30, are a married working couple with $100,000 in combined annual earned income. They want to understand how valuable different personal finance strategies could be to their lifetime finances and retirement security. [...])