Conclusion to: What Is a Well-Diversified Investment Portfolio?
<<– Continued from Part 1
In addition to showing that large numbers of additional stocks are required to achieve measurable improvements in diversification, the Evans and Archer study clarified other requirements for a well-diversified portfolio. The number of stocks selected for a highly diversified portfolio also depends on what one actually means by “the market.”
To achieve full diversification, as the scope of your definition of the “securities market” increases, you need to hold an increasing number of representative individual securities.
If one means the market for the largest U.S. companies, then the S&P 500 is one of several competing indexes and represents about 70% of total U.S. equity market capitalization. If one means the entire investable U.S. equities market, then the Wilshire 5000 is one of several that could be used. A global index would have many more stocks and would cover an even broader economic base. Therefore, the number of stocks to be well diversified would depend on what one means by the “market.” Within the meaning of finance literature, the full equity securities “market” portfolio is the global equities market and includes all investment styles and all countries.
In addition, to the numbers of different securities and their weighting, Evans and Archer indicated that you need to ensure that your securities selection process is random, if you wish to be fully diversified.
Your diversified investment portfolio construction methods should not biased toward one or another decision factor, such as being skewed toward a single industry or a subset of all industries.
Unless you buy the entire global market through an index fund or exchange-traded fund, your random selection of a subset of the whole market might be a method such as a “toss of the darts” at a capitalization-weighted stock page. This would mean that each security would have an equal chance of being selected for inclusion on a capitalization-weighted portfolio basis. Unless this random selection condition is met, the goal of constructing a highly-diversified portfolio would be disrupted, because you introduced a bias or skew through your selection methods.
Fundamental indexing investment product alternatives have received attention recently. Fundamental indexes select securities based on various company economic metrics rather than on a company’s securities market capitalization.
Concerning the use of capitalization weighting as the index benchmark for the full market and for full diversification, The Skilled Investor is well aware of the controversy percolating in the industry and in financial journals about the possible advantages and disadvantages of market capitalization weighting of mutual funds and ETFs. Supposedly “new” fundamental indexing methods are based upon various measures of a company’s economic impact, such as revenues, dividends, book value, number of employees, etc.
A detailed analysis of this “market capitalization” versus business or fundamental indexing metrics dispute is beyond the scope of this diversification article. In short, however, well-constructed statistical investment analyses of the past several decades have shown that other factors affect securities prices, in addition to the economic risk factors that affect the overall markets. In particular, a “value stock” versus “growth stock” factor seems to exist.
In general, over much longer periods value stocks tend to out-perform growth stocks. However, for shorter periods there is a cyclical and unpredictable ebb and flow, concerning when one or the other strategy produces superior returns.
Whether you should have a “value” versus “growth” emphasis in your investment portfolio selection has been debated for much longer than this more recent debate about “fundamental” indexing. In fact, fundamental indexing might just primarily be a better method to introduce a “value tilt” into an investment program.
However, the higher current fee structure associated with fundamental indexing investment vehicles on the market could nullify its potential risk-adjusted return advantage – partially or fully. There are very broadly diversified capitalization weighted market index funds and ETFs available with annual management fees of only .1% and total costs around .2% annually. [Since decimal points are sometimes hard to read on the web, note that these are "point one" and "point two" percent or one-tenth and two-tenths of one percentage point.]
Fundamentally indexed products have annual management fees that typically are .5% to 1.0% higher – not including other less visible costs, such as incremental trading expenses. You have to be very confident in your convictions about the superiority of fundamentally indexed funds to choose them over much cheaper capitalization weighted index mutual funds and ETFs.
These related articles may also be useful to you:
- What is investment portfolio diversification?
- Investment securities markets do not pay you for the risks of holding individual common stocks and bonds
- Why is diversification valuable to individual investors?
- Is the average individual investor’s portfolio well diversified?
- What is the cost to individual investors of sub-optimal portfolio diversification?
- How do changes in common stock price volatility affect diversification?
- How does the size of the common stock risk premium affect diversification?
- How many mutual funds are needed for a well-diversified portfolio? – evidence
- How many mutual funds are needed for a well-diversified portfolio? – a commentary
Personal Financial Planning
- Reduce investment expenses and control taxation – Step 7 of 10 Financial Planning Steps in the Right Direction (CLICK HERE TO READ THE SKILLED INVESTOR's OTHER ARTICLES ABOUT THESE "10 FINANCIAL PLANNING STEPS IN THE RIGHT DIRECTION
Even with optimal investment strategies, there is still substantial room to improve upon net investment performance through continued and vigilant focus on controlling investment costs and tax realization.
The fees extracted by the financial securities industry increased substantially [...])
- Excessive Investment Expenses Take 2% of Individual Investor Assets Every Year (Excessive investment expenses take 2% of individual investor's assets every year
Year after year, millions of people lose large amounts of money on unnecessary and unproductive investment costs and investment expenses.
The typical investor loses about 2% of portfolio assets every year by paying too much and getting too little in return.
This wasted 2% is not a [...])
- Insurable Risks Could Destroy Your Best Laid Financial Plans (
Do not ignore insurable risks that could destroy your best laid financial plans
A previous financial article, “The Solution - ONLY follow financial strategies that are scientific, passive, diversified, savings focused, risk controlled, low cost, and tax efficient,” suggested that investors are much better off with a well-considered financial plan. A stable set of financial beliefs [...])
- The Quality and Cost of Advice Paid by Investment Sales Loads – Part 2 (
Can you really get free and objective investment advice, when you pay investment sales loads? (Part 2 of 2)
Excessive investment costs and investment expenses are a plague on your lifetime personal financial planning.
Excessive investment expenses are one of the most significant barriers to lifelong family financial security. While financial services industry sales people tell you [...])
- How to distinguish between true investment skill and luck (
Even if an investor has obtained superior results over an extended period, is this sufficient proof that these investment results were actually due to skill rather than just a lucky streak?
No, these investment results could still be due to chance. For example, take a large population, such as all individual investors in the U.S., and [...])
- American Funds – AMCAP Fund – Class A Shares (AMCPX) fetch a +1 Fund Authority Score (The table below in this article presents The Skilled Investor's Fund Authority Score and other information for the American Funds - AMCAP Fund - Class A Shares.
The diversified investment fund strategy of the American Funds - AMCAP Fund - Class A mutual fund shares (AMCPX)
According to its prospectus filing on the U.S. Securities and Exchange [...])
- Understand the Confusing Securities Market Motion Picture (
Securities markets are usually very quick to adjust prices to reflect new information. However, this price adjustment process may take longer and be more volatile, if the new information is ambiguous.
At any point in time, market participants will already have used more or less rigorous valuation methods to judge their expected risk-adjusted value of securities. [...])
- 22 Ways to Avoid Financial Advisor and Investment Counselor Frauds and Scams (Avoiding financial advisor and investment counselor frauds and scams - Overview
The best way to avoid being defrauded or scammed by a financial or investment advisor is to investigate carefully several different advisers before hiring one of them.
If you carefully choose a financial adviser or investment counselor, you have a far greater chance of finding one [...])
- Developing Fund Authority Scores for ETFs and Mutual Funds (
Select mutual funds and ETFs with the most important economic factors that affect long term, diversified, and risk-adjusted investment fund returns
Good things are born small and grow over time. Regularly, The Skilled Investor evaluates individual mutual funds and ETFs and adds new articles that use the Fund Authority Score rating system. To be alerted when [...])
- Diversify To Avoid Investment Fraud (Another kind of investment diversification that individual investors should consider important relates to the failure or corruption of the financial industry intermediaries and fiduciaries that hold individual investors’ securities.
This meaning of diversification has nothing to do with scientific investment principles related to optimal portfolio diversification. However, it is still very important. Prudent investment practices would [...])
- Two Examples of the Tax Assets Graphic in VeriPlan (Two examples of the Tax Assets graphic in VeriPlan
TAX ASSETS: Taxable and Tax-Advantaged Financial Assets (real $/yr)
Below are two examples of the blue-tabbed TAX ASSETS graphic, which come from VeriPlan's "Sue and Sam Saver" tutorial. This graphic separates their cash, bond, and stock assets by account taxability throughout their lifetime projections. Assets are separated [...])
- Diversify with Low Cost Index Mutual Funds and ETFs Only (
During the last twenty-five years of the 20th century, mutual fund and exchange traded fund portfolio assembly costs declined dramatically.
Brokerage commissions were deregulated in 1975, and transaction costs have fallen very dramatically since then. Furthermore, well-diversified, low-cost index mutual funds have now become commonplace, while none existed in 1968. The mutual fund industry was still [...])
- Passive Index Investment Strategies are Superior (Passive index investment strategies are superior, because they narrow the range of outcomes and lower your investment risk
A previous article, “The Solution - ONLY follow financial strategies that are scientific, passive, diversified, savings focused, risk controlled, low cost, and tax efficient,” suggested that individuals are much better off with a well-considered financial viewpoint. A stable [...])
- 15 Value-Added Individual Investor Activities (Before estimating the investment value that you might add or take away from your portfolio, you first need to determine whether your strategies are or are not likely to lead to optimal risk-adjusted investment returns.
This value estimation is separate from any hourly opportunity cost related to spending time on your investments versus an alternative use [...])
- Advisor Costs and Strategies Determine Your Return on their Services (Financial advisor costs and the value of their investment strategies determine your return on investment from these investment advisor services
A previous financial article, “The Solution - ONLY follow financial strategies that are scientific, passive, diversified, savings focused, risk controlled, low cost, and tax efficient,” suggested that investors are much better off with a well-considered financial [...])
Comments are closed.