Yes, it can matter significantly how a financial advisor is paid.
The heart of the compensation issue is an advisor’s potential “conflict of interest” with respect to payments from third parties. Does third party compensation change the quality of the recommendations that the advisers make? If an advisor works on sales commissions or accepts other third party payments, will he still provide the best recommendations based solely on the client’s best interests?
The Skilled Investor believes that the great majority of advisors are ethical. They work to manage properly the conflicts of interest associated with third party compensation that most advisors receive. Many objective, competent, and ethical practitioners are doing excellent jobs for their clients – no matter what their source of compensation.
Fee-only advisors, receive compensation directly and solely from their clients. Other advisors receive compensation from third parties. Some may receive both. When choosing an advisor, individuals should first decide the type of advisor compensation that makes them most comfortable. (For information on the different types of advisor compensation, see: Financial planner and investment advisor compensation paid by clients and Financial planner and investment advisor compensation paid by third parties)
However, the problem for individual investors is not the ethical majority of practitioners. The problem is the ethically challenged minority.
The heart of the conflict of interest issue is whether a client can tell the difference between an ethical practitioner who “just happens to be paid by third parties” versus an unethical advisor to whom the client’s interests are secondary.
As you might expect, substantial controversy exists within the advisory industry about which forms of advisor payment are better for the client. Fee-only advisors argue that they have absolutely no conflict of interest in their obligation toward their clients. Assuming that a fee-only advisor is competent and diligent, a client can reasonably expect that the advisor’s recommendations will be objective and in the client’s best interests. Fee-only advisors say that commissioned advisors are just disguised salespersons.
Advisors who accept various forms of third party compensation insist that they can be objective. They also contend that they still can and do offer the best products to their clients.
Some commissioned advisors suggest that they are more motivated to meet clients’ needs. They say that their advice costs nothing, unless the client acts on a recommendation. Commissioned advisors may say that fee-only advisors are too disinterested, because they are paid whether or not a client acts upon their advice. They also argue that a client will still have to pay a transaction charge, if he were to go elsewhere to make the recommended purchase. Note that the size of the transaction charge is the crux of the issue, as well as the ongoing charges. See: Excessive investment costs are a huge problem for individual investors
Note also that conflict of interest relates only to suboptimal advisor recommendations and to associated actions that confuse fiduciary priorities. Clients will still receive legitimate financial products for their money. These products just might not be the best or the most cost effective product available.
More severe ethical shortcomings involve outright fraud. Such actions are not the subject of this article. For more information on protecting oneself from advisor fraud, see:
Also, see these related articles on advisor compensation:
Tags: sales commissions
Personal Financial Planning
- Use Scientifically Based Financial Planning Strategies (VeriPlan is designed to help you pursue scientifically based financial planning strategies
VeriPlan offers you unprecedented direct control to perform your own automated personal financial planning. VeriPlan's functionality also implements the principles of scientific finance. VeriPlan's internal documentation and its links to information on the web help you to understand scientifically based personal financial planning and [...])
- Day Trading Is a Terrible Idea (Why Day Trading Is a Terrible Idea
Investing success is built upon the idea of buying an asset at a discounted price, and then holding it for a long period of time as the value of the asset steadily rises due to the expected risk premium inherent in holding your capital in a risky asset. [...])
- Part 4 of the Biggest Personal Finance Story of the Past 30 Years ( < <-- Go to Part 3
The Biggest Personal Finance Story of the Past 30 Years - Part 4
What does it mean to individual investors that the financial services industry is now about 21% of S&P 500 market capitalization?
(For a graph of the relative percentage shares of various sectors within the S&P500 index over [...])
- Own Investment Mutual Funds and ETFs – Not Individual Securities (Own Investment Mutual Funds and ETFs - Not Individual Securities
Owning individual stock and bond securities is just a big waste of your valuable time and money
Individual investors tend to be terrible investment portfolio managers. Almost everyone can hire an index fund manager to do a much better job for far less time, money, risk, and [...])
- Rational Mutual Fund and ETF Selection (Rational selection of equity and bond mutual funds and ETFs - An Overview
Given the extremely large variety and number of available fixed income and equity investment mutual funds and ETFs, investors need a rational basis to select among them. Without scientific selection criteria and a good understanding of which factors are more or less likely [...])
- Fund Authority Scores for Stock ETFs and Mutual Funds – Management expenses, sales loads, and trading cost factors (
Fund Authority Scores range from -10 to +10 and measure five factors for diversified stock or equity investment funds: 1) annualized management and sales expenses, 2) trading costs, 3) historical performance, 4) fund maturity, and 5) operating efficiency.
Go to Part 2 -->>
This article explains how Fund Authority Scores rate stock or equity mutual funds and [...])
- Vanguard Total International Stock Index Fund (VGTSX) lands a +9 Fund Authority Score (The Vanguard Total International Stock Index mutual fund is a low cost alternative for broad, passive index investing internationally. This fund is a composite of three other Vanguard international funds: the Vanguard European Stock Index Fund (55.7%), the Vanguard Pacific Stock Index Fund (24.1%), and the Vanguard Emerging Markets Stock Index Fund (20.2%). The percentages [...])
- Comparing the Quicken and VeriPlan Lifetime Financial Planners (Comparing the Quicken and VeriPlan Lifetime Financial Planners
The Quicken personal finances organizer application includes the Quicken Retirement Planner, which projects the personal finances of a person or family across a lifetime. VeriPlan is a comprehensive and fully automated personal financial lifecycle planner for individuals and their families.
In this series of short articles, The Skilled Investor [...])
- Investment Valuation and Securities Risk for Individual Investors (
The securities markets provide an evolving consensus of the risk-adjusted value of particular securities.
By understanding how the markets value securities, individual investors can chose more durable investment strategies
Judging the potential usefulness of different investment strategies requires some understanding of what the public securities markets really do. This article discusses how the markets price financial securities [...])
- Earned Income Drives the Personal Finances of Most People (Do-It-Yourself Financial Planning - Earned income drives the personal finances of most people
The ability to project your various income sources automatically over your lifetime is one of the first steps in creating a useful do-it-yourself personal financial plan. Whether from wages and salary or from self-employment, personal earned income drives the lifetime finances of most [...])
- How many stocks are needed for a well-diversified portfolio? (Industry rules-of-thumb often state that 15 to 30 stocks are enough for a well-diversified portfolio. This can be very misleading.
Recent studies point out that industry rules-of-thumb on the number of stocks needed for a well-diversified portfolio are simply not adequate. These rules-of-thumb most often state that 15 to 30 stocks are enough. “The Truth About [...])
- Nationwide S&P 500 Index Fund – Class A Shares (GRMAX) fetch a +2 Fund Authority Score (Fund Authority Scores rate mutual funds and exchange traded funds (ETFs) on the most important economic factors that influence individual investors' net long term diversified investment fund performance. The Skilled Investor developed the Fund Authority Score system to provide individual investors with concise and objective summaries of mutual funds and ETFs for comparisons within investment [...])
- The Never Do List – Avoid Financial Advisor Frauds and Scams (
Part 2 of the The Never-Do List - 22 Good Ways to Avoid Financial Advisor and Investment Counselor Frauds and Scams
This article discusses things that you should “never do” with a financial planner or investment advisor, and it covers fees, payments, and proprietary investments.
You should never do certain things with a financial planning or investment [...])
- Financial Advisor and Investment Counselor Compensation Paid by Clients (There are three primary types of client paid advisor compensation: hourly-fee, fixed-fee, and asset-fee.
When choosing an advisor, individuals should first decide the type of advisor compensation that makes them most comfortable. How an advisor is compensated can be a very important issue. When you hire a financial planner or investment advisor, 1) you pay directly [...])
- How to Lie with Statistics – Investment Performance Charts (How to lie with statistics: Investment performance charts - A Tip from The Skilled Investor
Darrell Huff wrote a short and very informative book, "How to Lie with Statistics," which was first published in 1954 and was amusingly illustrated by Irving Geis. This book is still in print and remains very popular (Amazon book rank #2,040 [...])