Even if an investor has obtained superior results over an extended period, is this sufficient proof that these investment results were actually due to skill rather than just a lucky streak?
No, these investment results could still be due to chance. For example, take a large population, such as all individual investors in the U.S., and have each person perform a random chance operation like flipping a coin repeatedly. After many repetitions, a small portion of the population could appear to have remarkable results.
After 10 consecutive coin flips, some investors probably would have flipped 10 heads in a row (HHHHHHHHHH). If each head were to indicate a consecutive win in the stock market, that person might seem like an investment genius. However, ten heads in a row is no more or less likely than any other particular sequence of heads and tails. The person who flipped THTTHTTHHH has a sequence that is just as unique as 10 heads in a row. The person who flipped THTTHHTHHH, which is different only on the sixth coin toss, also has an equally unique sequence. However, to many people, these sequences of heads and tails would not appear to be nearly as exceptional as 10 heads in a row, even though the really are.
Repeated investment success may still be the result of luck rather than skill.
While it may appear that the person who got 10 heads in a row did something remarkable, it just appears to be more unusual, because the results were all the same. In a similar vein, if a large population of investors were each to choose investment securities at random and were to do this repeatedly, the results will be purely accidental. However, those who happened to pick securities with better results might seem like geniuses.
Given human propensities, you could almost guarantee that the longer the sequence of their accidental winners, the more the chests of these lucky winners would inflate with pride. They would probably also become increasingly vocal. The fact that they are no more or less likely to be a winner in the next round than any other participant, might be lost on them and anyone who hears their story, until the results of the next round are known. In addition, even if they lose the next round, they may conveniently not report their loss. Too many lucky throws of the investment dice and these persons could be absolutely insufferable at cocktail parties. (See: Can you really beat the securities markets? and Chance creates the illusion that investors can beat the stock market)
Only if an investor makes numerous specific predictions over time about WHY the prices of various securities will move in particular directions and those predictions come true far more often than not, can investment skill rather than dumb luck be demonstrated.
Because long-term success may still be due to random chance, there needs to be more stringent criteria for judging true investment skill. True skill might be demonstrated by two methods:
- An investor with superior skill could have a better understanding of what known information means and could use trading strategies to capitalize upon that better understanding. For example, such an investor might be better at using published accounting information to identify companies whose default risks would in fact turn out to be different from what others judge them to be. If such an investor made a large majority of such accurate selections, then it would be more probable that this analyst demonstrated superior skill.
- An investor with superior skill might be a better prognosticator of what is likely to happen in the future. In this case, the investor would make specific prior predictions about things that would happen. A higher degree of accuracy on specific predictions would be a way to identify an investor with skill.
Both of these potential sources of verifiable skill have a common element, which is the specificity of their predictions. Not only must an investor with skill call the direction of price movements, he must also predict why the price will move with a reasonably high degree of factual precision. If an investor predicts that a security will perform exceptionally well for specific reasons, and it does perform well, but for reasons that have nothing to do with his predictions, then this is still a chance result and not skill. (See: The illusion of superior professional investment manager performance)
The future unfolds unpredictably, and just because it turns out one way or another does not make an individual investor a genius or a fool.
An investor can only properly claim to be an investment genius when the proof is indisputable over a very long history of precise predictions of what would happen. Moreover, as with soothsayers and charlatans, it does not count to predict accurately a few times in the midst of a very large number of inaccurate predictions. Certain investors have received substantial acclaim because they once accurately called and acted upon a turn in the market, while their other erroneous predictions were forgotten.
Note also that an investor is not necessarily a fool if the future happens to unfold differently than he predicted. His assessment of opportunities and risks may have been reasonable at the time he made his judgment. However, what he may have been concerned about might not have materialized because other factors became more dominant. An investor is only a fool, if he convinces himself that he can predict the future, when he does not have a specific record of accomplishment as evidence. Investors who have been lucky and become over confident because of their past luck can become very dangerous to their own future financial welfare.
Tags: investment results
Personal Financial Planning
- The most effective strategy to increase your mutual fund and ETF investment returns (
What is the most effective strategy you have to increase your long-term mutual fund and ETF investment returns?
Just reduce your investment fees to rock bottom and buy directly to eliminate all sales loads. This strategy is both simple and entirely within your control. You do not have to be smarter than all those other smart [...])
- Chance creates the illusion that individual investors can beat the stock market (
"Market efficiency" makes it very difficult for individual investors to "beat the market."
Making their own decisions, individual investors perform so poorly that on average their investment returns lag behind the returns that one would expect from random stock selection.
The average professional trader does somewhat better than amateurs do, and professionals probably do so, in part, [...])
- Can you really beat the stock market? (
You are not likely to beat the stock market, despite all the cheer leading from the securities industry and the financial media.
When you try to beat the public securities markets, unfortunately you are more likely to trail the market’s return, because of extra costs, taxes, and investment mistakes.
The idea that investors can beat the market [...])
- The John Bogle Blog and His Financial Article About ETFs (John C. Bogle's Blog and his article about ETFs
This article is a heads-up to people interested in investment blogs and personal finance blogs.
John C. Bogle, the founder of The Vanguard Group, Inc., has a blog called The Bogle eBlog. (If you are wondering about "eBlog," it is an anagram of Bogle.) Mr. Bogle just posted [...])
- Diversify To Avoid Investment Fraud (Another kind of investment diversification that individual investors should consider important relates to the failure or corruption of the financial industry intermediaries and fiduciaries that hold individual investors’ securities.
This meaning of diversification has nothing to do with scientific investment principles related to optimal portfolio diversification. However, it is still very important. Prudent investment practices would [...])
- Investment Valuation and Securities Risk for Individual Investors (
The securities markets provide an evolving consensus of the risk-adjusted value of particular securities.
By understanding how the markets value securities, individual investors can chose more durable investment strategies
Judging the potential usefulness of different investment strategies requires some understanding of what the public securities markets really do. This article discusses how the markets price financial securities [...])
- Most Individual Investors Are Poor Personal Portfolio Managers (Most individual investors are poor investment portfolio managers
Investors more easily understand investment costs that are directly measurable, such as fees deducted on investment statements. However, many investors ignore or are unaware of the “opportunity costs” of their sub-optimal investment behaviors. Opportunity costs are usually much more difficult to measure directly, but these investment costs can [...])
- Use Caution with Classical Investment Books (Use Caution with Classical Investment Books - A Tip from The Skilled Investor
Individual investors should exercise caution when applying the tactics of classical investment books to current markets. The more handcrafted, seat-of-the-pants, and individual actor approach to the securities markets in the pre-computer, pre-networking era has given way to different practices. What might have worked [...])
- Excessive Investment Expenses Take 2% of Individual Investor Assets Every Year (Excessive investment expenses take 2% of individual investor's assets every year
Year after year, millions of people lose large amounts of money on unnecessary and unproductive investment costs and investment expenses.
The typical investor loses about 2% of portfolio assets every year by paying too much and getting too little in return.
This wasted 2% is not a [...])
- Rational Mutual Fund and ETF Selection (Rational selection of equity and bond mutual funds and ETFs - An Overview
Given the extremely large variety and number of available fixed income and equity investment mutual funds and ETFs, investors need a rational basis to select among them. Without scientific selection criteria and a good understanding of which factors are more or less likely [...])
- Fidelity Spartan 500 Index mutual fund (FSMKX) achieves the Best +10 Fund Authority Score (
The Standard & Poors 500 stock index is the most common equity index fund benchmark in the U.S. The S and P 500 tracks about 75% of publicly traded U.S. equity market asset value. The dominant issue in choosing among passively managed index mutual funds and ETF funds benchmarked against the S & P 500 [...])
- How Investment Securities Are Valued – Snapshots in Time (
Snapshots in time - How investment securities are valued
Every securities market transaction requires a buyer and seller with differing viewpoints.
Markets can operate, because there are differences between investors in their assessments of the intrinsic value and risk of securities.
Current investment values vary in the eyes of the many beholders of investment market securities. Knowledgeable participants [...])
- Does it matter how financial planners and investment advisors are paid? (
Yes, it can matter significantly how a financial advisor is paid.
The heart of the compensation issue is an advisor’s potential "conflict of interest" with respect to payments from third parties. Does third party compensation change the quality of the recommendations that the advisers make? If an advisor works on sales commissions or accepts other third [...])
- Financial Industry Product Development and Your Best Interests (
Financial research drives industry product development, but not necessarily toward the best interests of individuals
Personal financial decisions seem to have become very complicated. To add to the confusion, the financial services industry develops an unending array of supposedly innovative new products. However, a large part of the complexity that individuals face results from the proliferation [...])
- Vanguard Total International Stock Index Fund (VGTSX) lands a +9 Fund Authority Score (The Vanguard Total International Stock Index mutual fund is a low cost alternative for broad, passive index investing internationally. This fund is a composite of three other Vanguard international funds: the Vanguard European Stock Index Fund (55.7%), the Vanguard Pacific Stock Index Fund (24.1%), and the Vanguard Emerging Markets Stock Index Fund (20.2%). The percentages [...])