Choose mutual funds and ETFs with a minimum economical portfolio size
If you are going to invest in actively managed funds, then you should want them to have a sufficiently large asset base to fund the necessary research.
If an active fund is too small, then fund management quality can suffer or fees could grow. Index funds do not have the significant overhead that active funds have, which is associated with evaluating investment alternatives. Because of their much lower costs, the minimum size of passively managed index funds can be much less an issue than it is with an actively managed fund.
To amortize the management expenses that are necessary to manage properly an actively managed mutual fund or ETF each year, some minimum total asset figure is required. To illustrate, an actively managed $100M equity mutual fund with a 1% expense ratio yields $1 million annually for management expenses.
In the grand scheme of what it takes to run an actively managed mutual fund or ETF each year, $1M is just not a lot of money. Therefore, it would be reasonable for you to set your minimum asset selection criteria at several hundred million dollars or even higher for an actively managed equity mutual fund.
If your maximum annual management expense screening criterion were lower than 1%, then the required asset base would need to be proportionately higher. If the expenses of a particular “style” of active fund, such as emerging markets equities, tend to be even higher, then you would want an even larger asset base over which to spread active management costs.
While the scientific investment literature indicates that passive index fund strategies lead to better net performance on average, The Skilled Investor does not expect that actively managed funds will disappear. Therefore, if you still are going to invest in actively managed funds, then you should want them to have a sufficiently large asset base to fund the necessary research. If an active fund is too small, then fund management quality could suffer and/or fees could grow.
The problem with active professional fund management is not that there is no “gross” value added. On average, fund management professionals make a positive contribution before their expenses. They may be doing so at the expense of amateurs who are poor portfolio self-managers. (See: What is the cost to individual investors of sub-optimal portfolio diversification?)
The problem with active professional management is that, on average, they charge substantially more than they return in improved performance. The average active managers just does not make a sufficiently great incremental contribution to overcome his added cost, and there is no reliable way to tell future winners versus losers among active professional managers. Therefore, in “net” rather than “gross” terms, it is more likely for active managers to trail a passive market index return.
There are significant differences in costs between actively managed funds and passively managed index funds. By not attempting to beat the market, which most often will meet with failure, index funds can dramatically reduce costs and taxes and improve the odds of better net returns. While there are some areas of specialized expertise in index fund management, properly managing an index mutual fund depends largely on an efficient trading operation to track the index and an efficient customer service back-end.
Index funds do not have the significant overhead that active funds do associated with evaluating investment alternatives. Therefore, the demand for expensive staff is greatly reduced. Because of their much lower costs, the minimum size of passively managed index funds is much less of an issue than it is with actively managed funds. However, you should expect that passively managed index funds will have significantly lower expense ratios. With significantly lower annual expense ratios, index funds still need a reasonably substantial asset base to fund their management costs.
With an index fund, The Skilled Investor suggests that you screen index funds using the maximum expense ratio that you will personally tolerate. If an index fund is run efficiently, then their expense ratio should be very, very low. While there are some ridiculous examples of domestic index funds with expense ratios over 1% annually, even a .25% upper screening limit will give you a wide range of funds from which to choose.
Finally, note that newly created, actively managed funds that are spawned within a larger fund family may benefit for a time from both the fund family’s economies of scale and its subsidies. Administrative economies of scale can permit new funds with smaller asset sizes to exist for a longer period. Often, fund families will also subsidize the expense ratio of their newer funds. This temporarily reduced expense ratio can have the effect of increasing short-term performance. However, if a new fund does not grow quickly, then it is likely to be shut down or merged into an inferior performing and/or more risky fund within that mutual fund family.
Tags: managed index
Personal Financial Planning
- I Want My Treasure Back Please (PIRATES OF THE CREDIT SEA - Part 3: I want my treasure back!! (Please)
What are my rights in the situation that I summarized in my previous article: "PIRATES OF THE CREDIT SEA: My Treasure Is Taken!"? Well, the answer is very simple. I have a contractual right to get my treasure back. I also have [...])
- The Quality and Cost of Advice Paid by Investment Sales Loads – Part 2 (
Can you really get free and objective investment advice, when you pay investment sales loads? (Part 2 of 2)
Excessive investment costs and investment expenses are a plague on your lifetime personal financial planning.
Excessive investment expenses are one of the most significant barriers to lifelong family financial security. While financial services industry sales people tell you [...])
- American Funds – Capital Income Builder Fund – Class A Shares (CAIBX) attain a +4 Fund Authority Score (Fund Authority Scores rate mutual funds and exchange traded funds (ETFs) on the most important economic factors that influence individual investors' net long term diversified investment fund performance. The Skilled Investor developed the Fund Authority Score system to provide individual investors with concise and objective summaries of mutual funds and ETFs for comparisons within investment [...])
- California Investment S & P 500 Index Direct (SPFIX) pulls in a +8 Fund Authority Score (
The Standard & Poors 500 stock index is the most common equity index fund benchmark in the U.S. The S and P 500 tracks about 75% of publicly traded U.S. equity market asset value. The dominant issue in choosing among passively managed index mutual funds and ETF funds benchmarked against the S & P 500 [...])
- Your Investment Risk Tolerance Drives Your Asset Allocation Decision (
Your personal tolerance for investment risk should drive your asset allocation decision - A Tip from The Skilled Investor
Your tolerance for investment risk is a relative thing. Few people like investment risk, but some can handle it better than others do. The more investment risk you can and are willing to tolerate, the higher your [...])
- Traditional IRA and 401k Versus Roth IRA and Roth 401k Contributions (Traditional IRA and 401k versus Roth IRA and Roth 401(k) plan contributions
Many taxpayers puzzle over whether to contribute to traditional versus Roth tax-advantaged retirement plans. For most people, contributions to traditional tax-advantaged plans will probably provide a higher net present value over their lifetimes.
Given our tax-related software modeling capabilities, The Skilled Investor has some observations [...])
- Use Scientifically Based Financial Planning Strategies (VeriPlan is designed to help you pursue scientifically based financial planning strategies
VeriPlan offers you unprecedented direct control to perform your own automated personal financial planning. VeriPlan's functionality also implements the principles of scientific finance. VeriPlan's internal documentation and its links to information on the web help you to understand scientifically based personal financial planning and [...])
- Always Completely Diversify Your Investment Portfolio (Complete portfolio diversification is always a better idea.
On average, the securities markets will not pay you to hold any skewed subset of the overall market. Doing so is just a gamble that may or may not pay off. You should not expect to be paid any more for the added risk and anxiety.
A previous article, [...])
- 15 Value-Added Individual Investor Activities (Before estimating the investment value that you might add or take away from your portfolio, you first need to determine whether your strategies are or are not likely to lead to optimal risk-adjusted investment returns.
This value estimation is separate from any hourly opportunity cost related to spending time on your investments versus an alternative use [...])
- Are Your Financial Planning and Investing Strategies Scientific? (
Your financial planning and investing strategies should have a scientific basis
A previous article, "The Solution - ONLY follow financial strategies that are scientific, passive, diversified, savings focused, risk controlled, low cost, and tax efficient," suggested that individuals are much better off with a well-considered financial viewpoint. A stable set of financial beliefs can help you [...])
- No Financial Planning Software or Calculator Can Predict the Future – Part 2 (No financial planning software and no investment growth calculator can predict the future - Part 2
The future in not predictable, even with automated financial planning software.
The future is fundamentally not predictable. The future of personal financial planning and investing is similarly unpredictable. The Skilled Investor's approach with VeriPlan is different. As a lifetime financial planning [...])
- Fund Authority Scores for Stock ETFs and Mutual Funds – Historical investment performance (
Fund Authority Scores rate stock mutual funds and ETFs on the most important economic factors affecting long term diversified equity investment fund performance. This article explains how historical fund performance is calculated.
<<-- Go to Part 1
Go to Part 3 -->>
Part 1 of this article discussed direct and hidden investment costs, the most heavily weighted factors [...])
- Schwab S&P 500 Index Fund – Select Shares (SWPPX) capture the Best +10 Fund Authority Score (
Fund Authority Scores rate mutual funds and exchange traded funds (ETFs) on the most important economic factors that influence individual investors' net long term diversified investment fund performance. The Skilled Investor developed the Fund Authority Score system to provide individual investors with concise, objective, and realistic summaries of mutual funds and ETFs for comparisons within [...])
- The Never Do List – Avoid Financial Advisor Frauds and Scams (
Part 2 of the The Never-Do List - 22 Good Ways to Avoid Financial Advisor and Investment Counselor Frauds and Scams
This article discusses things that you should “never do” with a financial planner or investment advisor, and it covers fees, payments, and proprietary investments.
You should never do certain things with a financial planning or investment [...])
- Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund (VTSMX) achieves a +9 Fund Authority Score (
The diversified investment fund strategy of the Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund
According to the Vanguard website, the investment strategy of the Vanguard Total Stock Market Index mutual fund is to use a "passive management—or indexing—investment approach designed to track the performance of the MSCI® US Broad Market Index, which represents 99.5% or more of [...])