Choose mutual funds and ETFs with a minimum economical portfolio size
If you are going to invest in actively managed funds, then you should want them to have a sufficiently large asset base to fund the necessary research.
If an active fund is too small, then fund management quality can suffer or fees could grow. Index funds do not have the significant overhead that active funds have, which is associated with evaluating investment alternatives. Because of their much lower costs, the minimum size of passively managed index funds can be much less an issue than it is with an actively managed fund.
To amortize the management expenses that are necessary to manage properly an actively managed mutual fund or ETF each year, some minimum total asset figure is required. To illustrate, an actively managed $100M equity mutual fund with a 1% expense ratio yields $1 million annually for management expenses.
In the grand scheme of what it takes to run an actively managed mutual fund or ETF each year, $1M is just not a lot of money. Therefore, it would be reasonable for you to set your minimum asset selection criteria at several hundred million dollars or even higher for an actively managed equity mutual fund.
If your maximum annual management expense screening criterion were lower than 1%, then the required asset base would need to be proportionately higher. If the expenses of a particular “style” of active fund, such as emerging markets equities, tend to be even higher, then you would want an even larger asset base over which to spread active management costs.
While the scientific investment literature indicates that passive index fund strategies lead to better net performance on average, The Skilled Investor does not expect that actively managed funds will disappear. Therefore, if you still are going to invest in actively managed funds, then you should want them to have a sufficiently large asset base to fund the necessary research. If an active fund is too small, then fund management quality could suffer and/or fees could grow.
The problem with active professional fund management is not that there is no “gross” value added. On average, fund management professionals make a positive contribution before their expenses. They may be doing so at the expense of amateurs who are poor portfolio self-managers. (See: What is the cost to individual investors of sub-optimal portfolio diversification?)
The problem with active professional management is that, on average, they charge substantially more than they return in improved performance. The average active managers just does not make a sufficiently great incremental contribution to overcome his added cost, and there is no reliable way to tell future winners versus losers among active professional managers. Therefore, in “net” rather than “gross” terms, it is more likely for active managers to trail a passive market index return.
There are significant differences in costs between actively managed funds and passively managed index funds. By not attempting to beat the market, which most often will meet with failure, index funds can dramatically reduce costs and taxes and improve the odds of better net returns. While there are some areas of specialized expertise in index fund management, properly managing an index mutual fund depends largely on an efficient trading operation to track the index and an efficient customer service back-end.
Index funds do not have the significant overhead that active funds do associated with evaluating investment alternatives. Therefore, the demand for expensive staff is greatly reduced. Because of their much lower costs, the minimum size of passively managed index funds is much less of an issue than it is with actively managed funds. However, you should expect that passively managed index funds will have significantly lower expense ratios. With significantly lower annual expense ratios, index funds still need a reasonably substantial asset base to fund their management costs.
With an index fund, The Skilled Investor suggests that you screen index funds using the maximum expense ratio that you will personally tolerate. If an index fund is run efficiently, then their expense ratio should be very, very low. While there are some ridiculous examples of domestic index funds with expense ratios over 1% annually, even a .25% upper screening limit will give you a wide range of funds from which to choose.
Finally, note that newly created, actively managed funds that are spawned within a larger fund family may benefit for a time from both the fund family’s economies of scale and its subsidies. Administrative economies of scale can permit new funds with smaller asset sizes to exist for a longer period. Often, fund families will also subsidize the expense ratio of their newer funds. This temporarily reduced expense ratio can have the effect of increasing short-term performance. However, if a new fund does not grow quickly, then it is likely to be shut down or merged into an inferior performing and/or more risky fund within that mutual fund family.
Tags: managed fund
Personal Financial Planning
- Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund (VTSMX) achieves a +9 Fund Authority Score (
The diversified investment fund strategy of the Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund
According to the Vanguard website, the investment strategy of the Vanguard Total Stock Market Index mutual fund is to use a "passive management—or indexing—investment approach designed to track the performance of the MSCI® US Broad Market Index, which represents 99.5% or more of [...])
- Chance creates the illusion that individual investors can beat the stock market (
"Market efficiency" makes it very difficult for individual investors to "beat the market."
Making their own decisions, individual investors perform so poorly that on average their investment returns lag behind the returns that one would expect from random stock selection.
The average professional trader does somewhat better than amateurs do, and professionals probably do so, in part, [...])
- Never Invest Solely Because of Superior Past Investment Fund Performance (
Never invest solely because of superior past mutual fund or ETF performance
Superior past fund performance does NOT predict superior future performance.
Summary: A previous article, “The Solution - ONLY follow financial strategies that are scientific, passive, diversified, savings focused, risk controlled, low cost, and tax efficient,” suggested that individuals are much better off with a [...])
- Nationwide S&P 500 Index Fund – Class A Shares (GRMAX) fetch a +2 Fund Authority Score (Fund Authority Scores rate mutual funds and exchange traded funds (ETFs) on the most important economic factors that influence individual investors' net long term diversified investment fund performance. The Skilled Investor developed the Fund Authority Score system to provide individual investors with concise and objective summaries of mutual funds and ETFs for comparisons within investment [...])
- Vantagepoint 500 Stock Index mutual fund Class II Shares (VPSKX) rate a +9 Fund Authority Score (Here is some really good news for you. The Skilled Investor has published an article about lower cost S&P 500 index mutual funds that you can read, entitled: Low Cost S&P 500 Index Mutual Funds. The Standard & Poors 500 stock index is the most common equity index fund benchmark in the U.S. The S [...])
- Lifetime Investment Assets of Renters with Reduced Investment Costs (Lifetime investment assets of renters through investment cost improvements
Improving on Fran and Fred's lifetime financial plan through lower investment costs
Fran and Fred Frugal, both age 30, are a married working couple with $100,000 in combined annual earned income. They want to understand how valuable different personal finance strategies could be to their lifetime finances and [...])
- The Most Important Determinants of Your Lifetime Wealth (
Your personal earnings, expenditures, and savings are the most important determinants of your family’s long-term financial wealth
Summary: How much you earn, spend, and save are by far the most dominant determinants of your long-term financial well-being. Self-control in your decision-making regarding consumption is far more important than clever investing. Expenditure control works, while attempts [...])
- Fund Authority Scores for Stock ETFs and Mutual Funds – Fund maturity and operating efficiency (
Fund Authority Scores rate mutual funds and ETFs on the most important economic factors affecting long term diversified stock or equity investment fund performance. This article explains the investment fund maturity and operating efficiency factors.
<<-- Go to Part 2
Parts 1 and 2 of this article discussed the first three, most heavily weighted factors used in [...])
- California Investment S & P 500 Index Direct (SPFIX) pulls in a +8 Fund Authority Score (
The Standard & Poors 500 stock index is the most common equity index fund benchmark in the U.S. The S and P 500 tracks about 75% of publicly traded U.S. equity market asset value. The dominant issue in choosing among passively managed index mutual funds and ETF funds benchmarked against the S & P 500 [...])
- Searching for Superior Investment Fund Managers is a Waste of Your Time (
Searching for superior investment fund managers is a waste of your money and time
A previous article, “The Solution - ONLY follow financial strategies that are scientific, passive, diversified, savings focused, risk controlled, low cost, and tax efficient,” suggested that individuals are much better off with a well-considered financial viewpoint. A stable set of financial beliefs [...])
- Avoid High Turnover Mutual Funds and Active ETF Trading (Avoid investment funds with higher investment portfolio turnover
The problem with high turnover is that higher fund trading adds substantial hidden expenses that drag down returns.
Because short-term trading is a zero sum game (before costs) played against other well informed traders, greater turnover is far more likely on average to result in lower fund returns instead [...])
- Factors Favoring Roth IRA and Roth 401k Plan Contributions (Factors that tend to favor Roth IRA and Roth 401k tax-advantaged plan contributions
In a recent article, "Traditional versus Roth tax-advantaged plan contributions," The Skilled Investor discussed why the average taxpayer would tend to benefit more by contributing to traditional rather than to tax-advantaged Roth IRA and Roth 401(k) retirement plans. This follow-up article in two-parts [...])
- Retirement Savings Needs of Renters Without Financial Planning Improvements (Retirement savings needs of renters prior to any financial planning improvements
Starting to plan with a non-optimal baseline projection
Fran and Fred Frugal, both age 30, are a married working couple with $100,000 in combined annual earned income. They want to understand how valuable different personal finance strategies could be to their lifetime finances and retirement security. [...])
- Excessive Investment Expenses Take 2% of Individual Investor Assets Every Year (Excessive investment expenses take 2% of individual investor's assets every year
Year after year, millions of people lose large amounts of money on unnecessary and unproductive investment costs and investment expenses.
The typical investor loses about 2% of portfolio assets every year by paying too much and getting too little in return.
This wasted 2% is not a [...])
- A Financial Decision Tool That Becomes Increasingly Valuable Over Time (As a financial decision tool, VeriPlan becomes increasingly valuable with the passage of time
Summary: While VeriPlan is an genuine bargain because of its low cost, it is an even greater bargain, when you consider that VeriPlan has no built-in obsolescence and that it can be used productively for years. We have engineered VeriPlan, so that [...])